Tuesday, October 30, 2018

Pittsburgh


Scott Martelle wrote an article in Los Angeles Time titled: The killings in Pittsburgh weren't an anomaly. Violence and prejudice define us. This article is written in response to another tragedy in America. The intend audience is all Americans. The author points out that if we referred to ourselves as civilized nation, we should make the difference which is not happening. This article is worth reading, and I agree with the author when he states that “The cold hard reality is that we live in a racist, violent society.” You and I are part of this society. The founding fathers of America created a new nation dedicated to the idea that all men are created equal. There were so many great people who arise and defended this idea of equality. As a nation, we have made a lot of progress, unfortunately stereotyping and unequal treatment persist. The motivation of hate is so diverse, it includes racial, religious, political, sexual orientation and other characteristics. No matter what the motive could be, it often results to a tragedy of someone losing life. When I saw the title of this article, I directly criticized the author for saying that “violence and prejudice define us.” It is easy to deny and say that violence and prejudice do not define me, but when you sit and think about it, there is a truth in the statement. Why the number of hate crime is increasing every year? Sometimes, it is easier to ignore such thing when it has not happened in your neighborhood, one may feel like it doesn’t affect you because you just hear or see it on TV.
When we don’t act, we are part of the problem.
People are fighting all over the country against hate crime, but it takes an individual effort required from all of us to stand up to promote tolerance and inclusion. We must reject the idea of violence defining who we are. We need to break the chain and create a tolerant society and show the way to the next generation. Sitting home with our virtue does not help anymore.

Tuesday, October 16, 2018

We all have responsabilty to make democracy better !




In October 12, 2018, Adam B. Schiff, a member of House Intelligence Committed published an article in Washington Post about “How a democratic house will check this erratic president.” The author presented his opinion about the present Executive administration and how the Congress is handling the issues.  
In my opinion, the US has never been perfect but trying to make this nation a better place to live with its strong Constitution in place. Every past government has their reputation stained at some point. I’m not supporting all the current administration policies, but we should recognize some of the progress such as decline of unemployment rate. Every administration has their high and low time. I think everyone of us has a responsibility of making the democracy better, because it is a democratic nation which rely on the contribution of all citizens. The government of US don’t have the ability to take care of every single problem that arise in the world. How this “erratic president” is getting his way then? What happens to the system of checks and balances? The responsibility is on both Republican and Democratic parties. One important thing to consider is what citizens are looking when assessing their political opponents’ values and performances. In one side, Republicans criticizing Democrats of being too liberal, immoral, or lazy, in the other side, Democrats accusing Republicans of being too closed-minded. Who is wright or who is wrong? It all depends of which side you are of.  Maybe it is time for a strong third party in US. Adam Schiff opinion’s is surely a democratic partisanship point of views.

Tuesday, October 9, 2018

The Senate confirmed Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court


This short article “The senate confirmed Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Here's where each member stood.” is from Washington Post, contributed by Seung Min Kim and Amber Phillips. I would like to share it with my fellow classmate, because it coincided with our reading about the US government. I think it  is worth reading, because it reinforce our understanding about the process of confirmation of a supreme court judge in US. The confirmation vote of Judge Kavanaugh by the senate put in light the description of “separation of powers and Checks and Balances” in the US government system. According to our reading, In US, the national government is divided into three separate branches with different powers: Executive, Judicial, and Legislative. Each branch can restrict the powers of the others. Article two of the US Constitution allows President Trump to have the power to appoint Judge Kavanaugh as a federal judge, but the Senate must give the consent first. The consent is given by the senate after a series of hearings to determine the eligibility of Kavanaugh. After that the senate votes to confirm or reject the appointment of Kavanaugh as a Supreme Judge.


This is the link: